Home

Privacy Policy

Print

Privacy Policy for thenewargument.com 

If you require any more information or have any questions about our privacy policy, please feel free to contact us by email at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

At thenewargument.com, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us. This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by thenewargument.com and how it is used. 

Log Files
Like many other Web sites, thenewargument.com makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol ( IP ) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider ( ISP ), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user’s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable. 

Cookies and Web Beacons 
thenewargument.com does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser. 

DoubleClick DART Cookie 
.:: Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on thenewargument.com.
.:: Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to thenewargument.com and other sites on the Internet. 
.:: Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html 

Some of our advertising partners may use cookies and web beacons on our site. Our advertising partners include ....


These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on thenewargument.com send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see. 

thenewargument.com has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers. 

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. thenewargument.com's privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites. 

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browsers' respective websites. 

Meek and Ferre Battle for Headlines

Print

 

 

Florida Democratic Senate candidates are finding that grabbing attention opposite the hottest political race of the primary season is no easy feat.

The high-profile contest between moderate Gov. Charlie Crist and former State House Speaker and conservative poster-boy Marco Rubio for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate has obscured the primary race between U.S. Rep. Kendrick Meek and former six-term Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre.

The Democrats have mostly focused their efforts on attacking the Republicans rather than defining each other.

“There is a battle for the soul of the Republican Party going on and Florida is ground zero for the fight,” said Kenneth Quinnell, New Media Director for Meek’s campaign, in an email. “That may grab headlines, but it doesn’t help Floridians meet the challenges they face in this tough economy.”

A source within the Ferre campaign said, “Ferre has shot his way into the media by being more aggressive in attacking Crist, his ethics, and policy failures than Marco Rubio has.”

Neither Democrat has produced optimal results with this strategy; both candidates would lose today to either Republican by nearly identical, double-digit margins, according to a Fabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates poll conducted between Jan. 27-28.

Ferre and Meek must develop new strategies to break into the news cycle and reach more voters statewide in order to win the Democratic primary nomination on Aug. 31.

Meek is widely considered the favorite, with the strong support of the Democratic establishment and a huge money advantage, having raised $1.2 million last quarter and holding $2.7 million cash on hand.

Ferre raised $100,000 in his first quarter and has about $60,000 left, according to FEC reports, but has a potential fundraising base in Puerto Rico because of his strong support of statehood, a position favored by businessmen in the territory, and the legacy of his uncle, former Puerto Rican Gov. Luis A. Ferre.

A recent poll by Schroth Eldon & Associates found Meek leading Ferre 27 to 12 percent. The same polling firm found Meek leading Ferre 26 to six percent when Ferre entered the contest in November. Ferre has doubled his support, but the big story here is that the race remains wide open.

Meek, 43, and Ferre, 74, are launching new efforts to gain traction and increase their name identification. Meek’s campaign announced last week a bold public relations move: Meek, a longtime fan of racing, will be the lead sponsor of NASCAR driver Mike Wallace’s race car at the Daytona International Speedway on Feb. 13.

“NASCAR is an industry with strong ties to Florida that generates significant revenue for our economy,” said Quinnell. “This sponsorship is a recognition of that fact and a sign that Kendrick intends to speak to and for all Floridians.”

Ferre’s campaign expressed doubts about this strategy. “No one will confuse Kendrick Meek for a redneck just because he sponsors a NASCAR,” said the Ferre insider, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Meek’s campaign will likely continue to disregard Ferre’s candidacy. Asked if the primary race would be competitive, Quinell said, “That type of thing is for the pundits and bloggers to decide. Kendrick Meek is focused on being a champion for the people of Florida and defeating Crist and Rubio — the very people who got Florida into the fiscal mess it’s in now.”

Ferre, a moderate Democrat, has spent considerable time attacking Crist and much less attacking Meek, but his campaign appears to be getting more aggressive and moving to the left.

Ferre’s campaign has looked to foster an outsider image, drawing distinctions with Meek on hot-button issues by coming out against both the troop escalation in Afghanistan and the healthcare reform bills in Congress. Ferre said in a recent press release that the House and Senate healthcare bills “do not live up to the promises that President Obama and Democrats sold the American people in 2008.”

Meek supports the troop increase in Afghanistan and voted for the House Democrats’ healthcare plan.

Ferre also plans to attack Meek on his relatively thin legislative record and reports that he attempted to divert more than $5 million in federal money to his mother’s lobbying client. His mother, Carrie Meek, held his House seat for 10 years before entering the private sector.

Florida journalists have jumped at every opportunity to write Ferre’s political obituary. News that Ferre’s campaign manager, Todd Wilder, resigned in early January to care for his sick mother prompted a probing headline from Beth Reinhard in the St. Petersburg Times: “Time to put a fork in Maurice Ferre’s Senate campaign?”

Six months ago, the Miami Herald’s Adam Smith wrote that Rubio’s low initial fundraising numbers “cast doubt on [his] Senate bid.” But today Rubio leads Crist by 14 points among Republicans, according to a poll conducted by Fabrizio from Jan. 27-28. Six months from now, the Democratic primary will be a fundamentally different race.

 

Will Cronyism Take Down Charlie Crist?

Print

In November of 2008, I posed a question: will Jim Greer take down Charlie Crist?

With Governor Crist’s once seemingly inevitable Senate bid in dire straits and the the Republican Party of Florida publicly imploding before our eyes, it is time to revise and revisit this question.

Will cronyism take down Charlie Crist’s Senate campaign?

The Orlando Sentinel reported this week that soon-to-be former RPOF Chairman Greer secretly paid his hand-picked Executive Director Delmar Johnson, a former Crist field organizer who is miraculously as fat as Greer, roughly $405,000 in 2009. I’d be shocked if a large percentage of that money wasn’t sent back to Greer, which might explain why Johnson’s contract was confidential.

And after cutting up his own Party American Express card to appease critics calling for an audit of RPOF records, Greer used Johnson’s Party-issued Amex as if it were his own to pay for his travel and trips taken by Crist campaign staffers and some state legislators, according to the Orlando Sentinel.

“We’re done. I hope I never hear American Express again,” Greer said at the card-cutting ceremony, according to the Associated Press. “For those people who want to keep talking about the issue, they’re doing it for one reason and that is to cause trouble.”

The discussion did not end, nor did Greer’s excessive spending. In fact, he only got so reckless and desperate as to use his campaign for re-election as a slush fund. Greer’s paid himself $150,000 through his campaign, which also doled out more than $90,000 to Johnson.

RPOF records would not hold up to an IRS investigation. Greer  and Johnson would be roasted, like fat pigs, I might add. The million dollar question is, who else would go down?  I have to wonder why Crist remained loyal to Greer as calls for his resignation grew. Did Crist have an RPOF Amex? He expressed “extremely high” confidence in Greer as late as November.

Many (and arguably most) politicians are guilty of cronyism. The problem for Crist is that he picked the wrong cronies. They are too blatant; they can’t help themselves. It’s easy to follow the money.

George LeMieux - who had a hand in every pot during his short stay in the private sector, between his job as Crist’s Chief of Staff and his new gig as an appointed U.S. Senator - was paid $350,000 by RPOF over the same period of time that Seminole gaming interests were injecting $580,000 into the State Party and another $100,000 into the Conservative Values Coalition, an ECO that supported Crist in his gubernatorial bid.

Crist, who had opposed expansion of gambling during his 2006 campaign, quickly changed his tune. LeMieux acted as the chief negotiator for Crist with the Seminoles and offered them an unbelievable compact that would give them an unusually low tax on slot machine revenue and access to card games blocked by Florida law and the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

This compact was never ratified by the State Legislature and was later struck down by the Florida Supreme Court. Yet, Crist and LeMieux had done their part, as the Seminoles have been allowed to continue operation of these prohibited card games while the law remains in limbo.

After leaving the Governor’s office at the end of 2007, LeMieux continued to negotiate the compact between Crist and the Seminoles while managing the law firm Gunster Yoakley & Stewart, where he had previously worked from 1994-2002. The next gaming compact drawn up by Crist and LeMieux - which was dead on arrival in the legislature - would have given the Seminoles even more: a total monopoly on gambling.

When he rejoined Gunster in January 2008, LeMieux already had a plush first assignment: he was paid $500 an hour as part of a brand new contract with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in which his firm advised the state on its attempts to purchase right of way to the tracks owned by Florida East Coast Railroad (FECR).

It has been my contention that this work posed a conflict for LeMieux, as his firm simultaenously listed FECR’s parent company, Florida East Coast Industries (FECI), as a client. Mark C. Thibault has filed a bar complaint against LeMieux regarding his apparent double-dipping, as was first reported by Marc Caputo of the Miami Herald/St. Pete Times.

The back-and-forth between LeMieux and Thibault is quite interesting in that LeMieux never refutes any of Thibault’s supporting evidence and instead just repeatedly asks for the matter to be dismissed and attacks Thibault for his consulting work. LeMieux provides no explanation for why his firm’s website listed FECI as a client until August 2008.

Thibault appears to have caught LeMieux lying to the bar, too. LeMieux and Gunster claimed that he first began working on the FDOT project in March 2008, and Thibault forwarded the bar emails which show LeMieux working on the project two months earlier.

It’s possible that Thibault, a Democratic political consultant who ran a Miami-Dade slot machine referendum for Flagler Dog Track, filed the complaint as retribution for the ridiculously stilted Seminole compact. But Gunster’s repeated mention of his consulting work has absolutely nothing to do with the validity of his complaint, as Thibault has noted.

Crist’s unending loyalty to the shameless George LeMieux - who thinks he is a real Senator now, placing holds on appointments and co-sponsoring legislation - and thieving slob Greer has alienated many in his 2006 support team, which is why Crist’s campaign is caught between a rock and a hard place.

Crist has a reputation as a tireless, hard-nosed campaigner, but the damage to his Senate candidacy is already done. It’s time to stick a fork in him.

LeMieux’s Got Conflicts

Print

 

 

Before he was appointed to the U.S. Senate, George LeMieux benefited from a contract awarded in December 2007 by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to his law firm, Gunster Yoakley & Stewart, to advise the state on the purchase of right of way on the tracks of the Florida East Coast Railroad.

Gunster Yoakley obtained the contract on Dec. 20, 2007, just eleven days before LeMieux left his position as Gov. Charlie Crist’s Chief of Staff and rejoined the firm. LeMieux’s name was listed in the fee schedule in the contract signed on Dec. 20.

On Jan. 1, 2008, attorney Robert Hackleman scheduled a meeting between LeMieux and FDOT General Counsel Alexis Yarbrough, according to FDOT email records. Nine days later, LeMieux emailed Yarbrough to discuss adding attorney Bill Perry to “our team.”

It must have been convenient to leave government only to step through the Revolving Door and immediately into a government contract. But Gunster Yoakley should never have been awarded this contract because it was publicly available knowledge that the firm also represented the railroad’s parent company, Florida East Coast Industries (FECI).

Gunster Yoakley has denied that a conflict of interest exists, asserting that the firm’s relationship with FECI ended two years prior to the contract being signed.

However, by using the Internet Wayback Machine, it’s easy to find archived versions of Gunster Yoakley’s website and find that the firm’s website listed FECI and its real estate arm, Flagler Development, as clients as late as August 22, 2008.

While other clients were removed from the list and the page’s copyright year changed, FECI and Flagler remained on the list.

It’s not believable that Gunster Yoakley would accidentally showcase these companies in their Representative Clients section on its website for three years after the firm had stopped representing them, especially if they were concerned at all about the appearance of a conflict.

Gunster’s current website and the Aug. 2008 archived clients section, which features a 2007 copyright, both list Franklin Templeton as a client. Franklin Mutual Advisers was FECI’s largest shareholder when the company was purchased by Fortress Investment Group in July 2007, according to South Florida Business Journal.

If Franklin Mutual still held a stake in FECI when Gunster Yoakley obtained the contract with FDOT, then the firm is swimming up to its eyeballs in conflicts.

FDOT paid Gunster Yoakley $562,813.00 between February 22, 2008, and June 8, 2009, according to FDOT invoices. Roughly $12,350 of this figure went to LeMieux.

Here is a video demonstrating how to access the client list featured on Gunster Yoakley’s site on August 22, 2008:

 

And here is a screenshot taken of the site as it appeared on August 22, 2008:

 

Got a Tip?

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Advertisement:

Blogroll

  • 538
  • AMERICAblog
  • Andrew Sullivan
  • Balloon Juice
  • Ben Smith
  • Bob Cesca
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Daily Kos
  • Deep Capture
  • Ezra Klein
  • FLA Politics
  • From the Left
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Irreverent View
  • Liberal Values
  • Matt Taibbi
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • Media Matters
  • Political Carnival
  • Politics1
  • Sadly, No
  • Spencer Ackerman
  • Stark Reports
  • Steve Benen
  • Talking Points Memo
  • TalkLeft
  • The Huffington Post
  • The Moderate Voice
  • The Next American City
  • The Plum Line
  • The Smirking Chimp
  • Think Progress